summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
blob: 2ba8731b90e5e639c1d1ac32eefde1af1e1da2fb (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
=====================================
Maintenance of Python implementations
=====================================

Notes specific to Python interpreters
=====================================
CPython patchsets
-----------------
Gentoo is maintaining patchsets for all CPython versions.  These include
some non-upstreamable Gentoo patches and upstream backports.  While it
is considered acceptable to add a new patch (e.g. a security bug fix)
to ``files/`` directory, it should be eventually moved into
the respective patchset.

When adding a new version, it is fine to use an old patchset if it
applies cleanly.  If it does not, you should regenerate the patchset
for new version.

The origin for Gentoo patches are the ``gentoo-*`` tags the `Gentoo fork
of CPython repository`_.  The recommended workflow is to clone
the upstream repository, then add Gentoo fork as a remote, e.g.::

    git clone https://github.com/python/cpython
    cd cpython
    git remote add gentoo git@git.gentoo.org:fork/cpython.git
    git fetch --tags gentoo

In order to rebase the patchset, check out the tag corresponding
to the previous patchset version and rebase it against the upstream
release tag::

    git checkout gentoo-3.7.4
    git rebase v3.7.6

You may also add additional changes via ``git cherry-pick``.  Once
the new patches are ready, create the tarball and upload it, then
create the tag and push it::

    mkdir python-gentoo-patches-3.7.6
    cd python-gentoo-patches-3.7.6
    git format-patch v3.7.6
    cd ..
    tar -cf python-gentoo-patches-3.7.6.tar python-gentoo-patches-3.7.6
    xz -9 python-gentoo-patches-3.7.6.tar
    scp python-gentoo-patches-3.7.6.tar.xz ...
    git tag gentoo-3.7.6
    git push --tags gentoo


PyPy
----
Due to high resource requirements and long build time, PyPy on Gentoo
is provided both in source and precompiled form.  This creates a bit
unusual ebuild structure:

- ``dev-python/pypy-exe`` provides the PyPy executable and generated
  files built from source,
- ``dev-python/pypy-exe-bin`` does the same in precompiled binary form,
- ``dev-python/pypy`` combines the above with the common files.  This
  is the package that runs tests and satisfies the PyPy target.

Matching ``dev-python/pypy3*`` exist for PyPy3.

When bumping PyPy, ``pypy-exe`` needs to be updated first.  Then it
should be used to build a binary package and bump ``pypy-exe-bin``.
Technically, ``pypy`` can be bumped after ``pypy-exe`` and used to test
it but it should not be pushed before ``pypy-exe-bin`` is ready, as it
would force all users to switch to source form implicitly.

The binary packages are built using Docker_ nowadays, using
binpkg-docker_ scripts.  To produce them, create a ``local.diff``
containing changes related to PyPy bump and run ``amd64-pypy``
(and/or ``amd64-pypy3``) and ``x86-pypy`` (and/or ``x86-pypy3``) make
targets::

    git clone https://github.com/mgorny/binpkg-docker
    cd binpkg-docker
    (cd ~/git/gentoo && git diff origin) > local.diff
    make amd64-pypy amd64-pypy3 x86-pypy x86-pypy3

The resulting binary packages will be placed in your home directory,
in ``~/binpkg/${arch}/pypy``.  Upload them and use them to bump
``pypy-exe-bin``.


Adding a new Python implementation
==================================
Eclass and profile changes
--------------------------

.. Note::

   The best time to perform these changes is prior to adding the first
   beta of new Python version.  This is because ``dev-lang/python``
   has a conditional dependency on ``dev-lang/python-exec``
   for non-alpha versions, so adding the target prior to committing it
   ensures depgraph consistency.

When adding a new Python target, please remember to perform all
the following tasks:

- add the new target flags to ``profiles/desc/python_targets.desc``
  and ``python_single_target.desc``.

- force the new implementation on ``dev-lang/python-exec``
  via ``profiles/base/package.use.force``.

- mask the new target flags on stable profiles
  via ``profiles/base/use.stable.mask``.

- update ``python-utils-r1.eclass``:

  1. add the implementation to ``_PYTHON_ALL_IMPLS``

  2. update the patterns in ``_python_verify_patterns``

  3. update the patterns in ``_python_set_impls``

  4. update the patterns in ``_python_impl_matches``

  5. add the appropriate dependency to the case for ``PYTHON_PKG_DEP``

- update the tested version range in ``eclass/tests/python-utils-r1.sh``

- add the new implementation to the list
  in ``app-portage/gpyutils/files/implementations.txt``.

- update the `implementation tables`_ on Gentoo wiki


Porting initial packages
------------------------
The initial porting is quite hard due to a number of circular
dependencies.  To ease the process, it is recommended to temporarily
limit testing of the packages that feature many additional test
dependencies.  The packages needing this have implementation conditions
in place already.  An example follows:

.. code-block:: bash
   :emphasize-lines: 6,18,23

    PYTHON_TESTED=( python3_{8..10} pypy3 )
    PYTHON_COMPAT=( "${PYTHON_TESTED[@]}" python3_11 )

    BDEPEND="
        test? (
            $(python_gen_cond_dep '
                dev-python/jaraco-envs[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
                >=dev-python/jaraco-path-3.2.0[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
                dev-python/mock[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
                dev-python/pip[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
                dev-python/sphinx[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
                dev-python/pytest[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
                dev-python/pytest-fixture-config[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
                dev-python/pytest-virtualenv[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
                dev-python/pytest-xdist[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
                >=dev-python/virtualenv-20[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
                dev-python/wheel[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
            ' "${PYTHON_TESTED[@]}")
        )
    "

    python_test() {
        has "${EPYTHON}" "${PYTHON_TESTED[@]/_/.}" || continue

        HOME="${PWD}" epytest setuptools
    }

It is important to remember to update the implementation range
and therefore enable testing once the test dependencies are ported.
Please do not remove the conditions entirely, as they will be useful
for the next porting round.

If only a non-significant subset of test dependencies is a problem,
it is better to make these dependencies conditional and run
the remainder of the test suite.  If tests are not skipped automatically
due to missing dependencies, using ``has_version`` to skip them
conditionally is preferred over hardcoding version ranges, e.g.:

.. code-block:: bash
   :emphasize-lines: 3-6,12

    BDEPEND="
        test? (
            $(python_gen_cond_dep '
                dev-python/pydantic[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
            ' pypy3 python3_{8..10}  # TODO: python3_11
            )
        )
    "

    python_test() {
        local EPYTEST_DESELECT=()
        if ! has_version "dev-python/pydantic[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]"; then
            EPYTEST_DESELECT+=(
                tests/test_comparison.py::test_close_to_now_{false,true}
            )
        fi
        epytest
    }

During the initial testing it is acceptable to be more lenient on test
failures, and deselect failing tests on the new implementation when
the package itself works correctly for its reverse dependencies.
For example, during Python 3.11 porting we have deselected a few failing
tests on ``dev-python/attrs`` to unblock porting ``dev-python/pytest``.
Porting pytest in order to enable testing packages was far more
important than getting 100% passing tests on ``dev-python/attrs``.

The modern recommendation for the porting process is to focus
on ``dev-python/pytest`` as the first goal.  It is the most common test
dependency for Python packages, and porting it makes it possible to
start testing packages early.  The initial ported package set should
include all dependencies of pytest, except for test dependencies
of the package with large test dependency graphs (``dev-python/pytest``
itself, ``dev-python/setuptools``).  This amounts to around 40 packages.

Note that emerging the initial set requires installing
``dev-python/pytest`` with ``USE=-test`` first.  Once it is installed,
the previously installed dependencies should be reinstalled with tests
enabled.

After pushing the initial batch, the next recommended goal
is ``dev-python/urllib3``.  It should be followed by focusing
on reenabling tests in the packages where they were skipped.


Removing a Python implementation
================================
Preparation
-----------
The obsolescence of the implementation needs to be announced on mailing
lists, along with request to proceed with porting packages to a newer
implementation.  The package lists found on `QA reports`_ can be used
to track the porting progress.

As the time for removal approaches, the packages showing no signs
of porting effort (except for backports, i.e. packages dedicated
to the old implementation and used only conditionally to it) need to
be masked for removal.


Eclass and profile changes
--------------------------
Rather than being removed entirely, old targets are implicitly disabled
via the eclass.  This ensures that old entries in ``PYTHON_COMPAT``
do not trigger errors.

When disabling an old target, please remember to:

- remove the ``dev-lang/python-exec`` dependency from the interpreter
  ebuilds (with a revision bump)

- mask and remove the remaining backport packages immediately (they
  would fail to source once the only listed implementation is disabled
  but the mask should remain to hint users at the removal)

- update the tested version range in ``eclass/tests/python-utils-r1.sh``

- update ``python-utils-r1.eclass``:

  1. move the implementation from ``_PYTHON_ALL_IMPLS``
     to ``_PYTHON_HISTORICAL_IMPLS``

  2. update the patterns in ``_python_set_impls``

  3. remove the respective case for ``PYTHON_PKG_DEP``

- remove the use of implementation flags from ``profiles/`` tree

- remove the flags from ``profiles/desc/python_targets.desc``
  and ``profiles/desc/python_single_target.desc``

- set the implementation status to ``dead``
  in ``app-portage/gpyutils/files/implementations.txt``

- update the `implementation tables`_ on Gentoo wiki


Python build system bootstrap
=============================
Python build systems are often facing the bootstrap problem — that is,
the build system itself has some dependencies, while these dependencies
require the same build system to build.  The common upstream way
(actually recommended in `PEP 517 build requirements`_ section) is
to bundle the necessary dependencies as part of the build system.
However, this goes against best Gentoo practices.

The current Gentoo practice for bootstrap with dependency unbundling
is to:

1. Install the dependencies of flit_core and the eclass PEP 517 logic
   (installer, tomli) manually using ``python_domodule``.

2. Install flit_core using the standalone PEP 517 backend.

3. Install the dependencies of setuptools using flit (writing trivial
   ``pyproject.toml`` within the ebuild if necessary).

4. Install setuptools using the standalone PEP 517 backend.

5. The dependencies of other build systems can be installed using
   flit, setuptools or other previously unbundled build systems.

Note that for the purpose of bootstrap only obligatory baseline
dependencies are considered significant.  Non-obligatory dependencies
(i.e. ones that can be missing during the bootstrap process) can be
placed in ``PDEPEND``.  Test suite dependencies can include cycles
with the package itself — running tests is not considered obligatory
during the bootstrap process.

flit_core has been chosen as the base build system for unbundling since
it has the fewest external dependencies (i.e. only depends on tomli).
Its author indicates in the `flit_core vendoring README`_ that no other
dependencies will be added or vendored into flit_core.


.. _Gentoo fork of CPython repository:
   https://gitweb.gentoo.org/fork/cpython.git/
.. _Docker: https://www.docker.com/
.. _binpkg-docker: https://github.com/mgorny/binpkg-docker
.. _implementation tables:
   https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Python/Implementations
.. _QA reports: https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/
.. _PEP 517 build requirements:
   https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0517/#build-requirements
.. _flit_core vendoring README:
   https://github.com/pypa/flit/blob/main/flit_core/flit_core/vendor/README