blob: ef091674828202777f620fe52d13392c7b386a5c (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
|
Present:
Koon (Thierry Carrez)
Swift (Sven Vermeulen)
agriffis (Aron Griffis)
dsd_ (Daniel Drake)
cshields (Corey Shields)
vapier (Mike Frysinger)
Agenda:
* GLEP 44 - Manifest2 format after council recommended changes
* GLEP 42 - Critical News Reporting
Outcome:
* Council members were generally in agreement that GLEP 44 is a good idea,
and were happy with the changes that genone made to the document after the
last meeting.
* Concil members decided that in order to vote on GLEP 42, an
implementation plan needed to be submitted with the glep. Generally, they
agreed that it's a good idea, but only if it's actually implemented.
Questions arose as to who will be doing the implementation work.
* An interesting point of concern is what to do in the absence of an active
maintainer, with regards to security flaws in packages. An absent maintainer
in this sense is either one who is inattentive or one who is away/missing/gone
for some reason. Hopefully a future glep or thread will expand dsd's idea for
opening up the development community. Has anyone seen where the LWP-UserAgent
might have gone off to?
|
GitWeb
