mail-filter/spf-engine: drop 2.9.3

Signed-off-by: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org>

2 files changed, 0 insertions, 78 deletions

diff --git a/mail-filter/spf-engine/Manifest b/mail-filter/spf-engine/Manifest
index a1a785990a37..f7084f23353b 100644
--- a/mail-filter/spf-engine/Manifest
+++ b/mail-filter/spf-engine/Manifest
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-DIST spf-engine-2.9.3.tar.gz 52974 BLAKE2B 9e6c47af7d523e1486d9bbfee2b0e53a4a97dbfc93e1cd14f70d4676542defaf6fede397d33e21c00e9bb2cdd1016c98981b6c0e735bdfd225b226920b9470b1 SHA512 adde80eca38f372ad00ed7355951007b9c02ef8a52a5a4edcbf2fa9959220f1083e3e313668e9c7ad2c26144148ae8ff62ec468d79936d96b43897598254f528
 DIST spf-engine-3.0.3.tar.gz 61350 BLAKE2B f28dfb10559bfd61be152a4b65a5653ec50b25718fcb63f8a2c9532fd9d52a51c131c99ba5408bd6aa424adc5ce6094da7eeb97dbacd7e60e8abb48c65c4f188 SHA512 08db392d2cce16651ba416fcd265e6606e1a8af3cb88721ed149a2286d11ac9ea6ed4d01572cea6950740890c3334e8e0d496d1d1e9edcc29d04833fec049ab0
diff --git a/mail-filter/spf-engine/spf-engine-2.9.3.ebuild b/mail-filter/spf-engine/spf-engine-2.9.3.ebuild
deleted file mode 100644
index bc923ece8954..000000000000
--- a/mail-filter/spf-engine/spf-engine-2.9.3.ebuild
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
-# Copyright 1999-2023 Gentoo Authors
-# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
-
-EAPI=8
-
-PYPI_NO_NORMALIZE=1
-PYTHON_COMPAT=( python3_9 python3_10 )
-
-# The built-in ipaddress module handles the parsing of IP addresses. If
-# python is built without ipv6 support, then ipaddress can't parse ipv6
-# addresses, and the daemon will crash if it sees an ipv6 SPF record. In
-# other words, it's completely broken.
-PYTHON_REQ_USE="ipv6(+)"
-
-inherit distutils-r1 pypi
-
-DESCRIPTION="Policy daemon and milter for Postfix SPF verification"
-HOMEPAGE="https://launchpad.net/spf-engine"
-
-LICENSE="Apache-2.0"
-SLOT="0"
-KEYWORDS="amd64 x86"
-IUSE=""
-
-DEPEND="dev-python/pyspf[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]"
-
-RDEPEND="${DEPEND}
-	dev-python/authres[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]"
-
-DOCS=( CHANGES policyd-spf.conf.commented README README.per_user_whitelisting )
-
-python_prepare_all() {
-	# The "real" config file mentions the commented one, so we point
-	# users in the right direction.
-	local oldconf="policyd-spf.conf.commented"
-	local newconf="/usr/share/doc/${PF}/${oldconf}"
-
-	sed -e "1 s~ ${oldconf}~,\n#  ${newconf}~" -i policyd-spf.conf \
-		|| die 'failed to update commented config file path'
-
-	distutils-r1_python_prepare_all
-}
-
-src_install() {
-	distutils-r1_src_install
-
-	# Remove the milter files that are installed by default. The milter
-	# isn't quite ready:
-	#
-	#   * The README says it's experimental not well-tested.
-	#   * There's no documentation for its configuration parameters
-	#     (expecially the UserID).
-	#   * The configuration file is hard-coded to /usr/local.
-	#   * The paths in the systemd service file are hard-coded to /usr/local.
-	#   * We need to write an OpenRC service script for it.
-	#
-	# These are all eventually doable, but I'm not willing to commit to
-	# making the milter work before upstream is.
-	#
-	rm "${ED}/usr/bin/pyspf-milter" \
-		|| die "failed to remove ${ED}/usr/bin/pyspf-milter"
-	rm -r "${ED}/usr/lib/systemd" \
-		|| die "failed to remove ${ED}/usr/lib/systemd"
-	rm -r "${ED}/usr/etc/init.d" \
-		|| die "failed to remove ${ED}/usr/etc/init.d"
-	einfo "The milter component of spf-engine is still deemed experimental"
-	einfo "and not well-tested by upstream. It's missing configuration"
-	einfo "files, service scripts, and documentation. In other words, it"
-	einfo "doesn't work yet."
-
-	# The setuptools installation routing always works relative to
-	# python's prefix, so that when installing locally you wind up
-	# with paths like /usr/local/etc. However for system installs
-	# that does the wrong thing and puts the sysconfdir at /usr/etc.
-	# Here we move it to the right place.
-	mv -v "${ED}/usr/etc" "${ED}/" || die 'failed to relocate sysconfdir'
-}