summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
blob: e30180845b04209f4530e93d404641434612ebd2 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
# ChangeLog for sys-libs/libutempter
# Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL v2
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/sys-libs/libutempter/ChangeLog,v 1.25 2007/04/25 13:52:25 gustavoz Exp $

  25 Apr 2007; Gustavo Zacarias <gustavoz@gentoo.org>
  libutempter-1.1.5.ebuild:
  Stable on sparc

  24 Apr 2007; Raúl Porcel <armin76@gentoo.org> libutempter-1.1.5.ebuild:
  ia64 + x86 stable

*libutempter-1.1.5 (28 Feb 2007)

  28 Feb 2007; Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>
  +libutempter-1.1.5.ebuild:
  version bump, thanks to Martin von Gagern in bug #168435

  28 Feb 2007; Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>
  libutempter-1.1.4.1.ebuild:
  switch to using tarball instead of an rpm: patch from Martin von Gagern in
  bug #167311

  14 Oct 2006; Bryan Østergaard <kloeri@gentoo.org>
  libutempter-1.1.4.1.ebuild:
  Stable on Alpha.

  23 Sep 2006; Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@gentoo.org>
  libutempter-1.1.4.1.ebuild:
  hppa stable, bug #148504

  21 Sep 2006; <blubb@gentoo.org> libutempter-1.1.4.1.ebuild:
  stable on amd64

  21 Sep 2006; Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@gentoo.org>
  libutempter-1.1.4.1.ebuild:
  ppc stable, bug #148504

  21 Sep 2006; Gustavo Zacarias <gustavoz@gentoo.org>
  libutempter-1.1.4.1.ebuild:
  Stable on sparc wrt #148504

  21 Sep 2006; <ticho@gentoo.org> libutempter-1.1.4.1.ebuild:
  Stable on x86, bug #148504.

  21 Sep 2006; Brent Baude <ranger@gentoo.org> libutempter-1.1.4.1.ebuild:
  Marking libutempter-1.1.4.1 ppc64 stable per bug 148504

  21 Sep 2006; Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>
  libutempter-1.1.2.1.ebuild, libutempter-1.1.4.1.ebuild:
  explicitly set RDEPEND, see bug #142755. This one thanks to Straaken2 in
  #gentoo-portage

  23 Aug 2006; Carsten Lohrke <carlo@gentoo.org> libutempter-1.1.2.1.ebuild,
  libutempter-1.1.4.1.ebuild:
  Blocking the virtual is apparently right...

  23 Aug 2006; Carsten Lohrke <carlo@gentoo.org> libutempter-1.1.2.1.ebuild,
  libutempter-1.1.4.1.ebuild:
  Do not block the virtual, but the other packages providing it - and do so at
  runtime as well.

  07 Jun 2006; Diego Pettenò <flameeyes@gentoo.org>
  libutempter-1.1.4.1.ebuild:
  Re-add ~x86-fbsd keyword after adding linking with -lutil on FreeBSD.

  07 Jun 2006; Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>
  libutempter-1.1.2.1.ebuild, libutempter-1.1.4.1.ebuild:
  support ROOT at SpankY's request

  24 May 2006; Diego Pettenò <flameeyes@gentoo.org>
  libutempter-1.1.2.1.ebuild:
  Use the right compiler so that cross-distcc does not fail.

  13 Apr 2006; Diego Pettenò <flameeyes@gentoo.org>
  libutempter-1.1.2.1.ebuild:
  Add includedir to make sure headers aren't installed in /include.

  31 Mar 2006; Diego Pettenò <flameeyes@gentoo.org>
  libutempter-1.1.2.1.ebuild:
  Add ~x86-fbsd keyword.

  23 Dec 2005; Michael Hanselmann <hansmi@gentoo.org>
  libutempter-1.1.2.1.ebuild:
  Stable on ppc.

  17 Dec 2005; Ferris McCormick <fmccor@gentoo.org>
  libutempter-1.1.2.1.ebuild:
  Stable on sparc; it does update utmp entries, as desired (Bug #115663).

  17 Dec 2005; Markus Rothe <corsair@gentoo.org> libutempter-1.1.2.1.ebuild:
  Stable on ppc64

  17 Dec 2005; Bryan Østergaard <kloeri@gentoo.org
  libutempter-1.1.2.1.ebuild:
  Stable on alpha, bug 115663.

  29 Jul 2005; Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>
  libutempter-1.1.2.1.ebuild:
  ready for stable on x86 and amd64

*libutempter-1.1.2.1 (13 May 2005)

  13 May 2005; Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>
  +libutempter-1.1.2.1.ebuild:
  New package as a replacement for sys-apps/utempter. This seems to be the
  package we will move to as the preferred utempter, as it works better for
  freebsd, and also mike harris of redhat/freedesktop is rumoured to be
  rejumping the development of this.  At any rate, at least Flameeyes will
  be happy.