blob: 74b453d22879b7b0e76ef362f0dbfebb1588987c (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
|
# ChangeLog for dev-java/jgraph
# Copyright 2000-2007 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL v2
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-java/jgraph/ChangeLog,v 1.16 2007/02/28 18:01:00 blubb Exp $
28 Feb 2007; Simon Stelling <blubb@gentoo.org> jgraph-5.9.2.0.ebuild:
stable on amd64; bug 154366
18 Feb 2007; nixnut <nixnut@gentoo.org> jgraph-5.9.2.0.ebuild:
Stable on ppc wrt bug 154366
29 Dec 2006; <fauli@gentoo.org> jgraph-5.9.2.0.ebuild:
stable on x86, bug #154366
12 Oct 2006; Vlastimil Babka <caster@gentoo.org> jgraph-5.9.2.0.ebuild:
Fixed typo for source USE flag, thanks to Matthias Langer <mlangc@gmx.at> in
bug #129638 for pointing out.
*jgraph-5.9.2.0 (11 Oct 2006)
11 Oct 2006; Vlastimil Babka <caster@gentoo.org> +jgraph-5.9.2.0.ebuild:
Version bump wrt bug #129638, migrated to gen-2 eclasses, added source and
examples USE flags.
05 Oct 2006; Gustavo Zacarias <gustavoz@gentoo.org> jgraph-3.2.ebuild:
Dropping sparc keywords, see #96229
22 Apr 2005; Simon Stelling <blubb@gentoo.org> jgraph-3.2.ebuild:
stable on amd64
03 Nov 2004; Thomas Matthijs <axxo@gentoo.org> jgraph-3.2.ebuild:
depend on app-arch/unzip
22 Oct 2004; Dylan Carlson <absinthe@gentoo.org> jgraph-3.2.ebuild:
Keywords ~amd64.
17 Oct 2004; Thomas Matthijs <axxo@gentoo.org> jgraph-3.2.ebuild:
keyword x86
16 Oct 2004; Thomas Matthijs <axxo@gentoo.org> jgraph-3.2.ebuild:
use java-pkg_dohtml instead of dohtml to also install the package-list in
case of api docs: #50740
05 May 2004; <SeJo@gentoo.org> jgraph-3.2.ebuild:
added ~ppc keyword
*jgraph-3.2 (01 Apr 2004)
01 Apr 2004; Chris Aniszczyk <zx@gentoo.org> jgraph-3.1.ebuild,
jgraph-3.2.ebuild:
Version bump and clean up. Closes #46006
*jgraph-3.1 (15 Feb 2004)
15 Feb 2004; Chris Aniszczyk <zx@gentoo.org> jgraph-3.1.ebuild:
Initial Import.
Thanks to Stanislas Nanchen <stan@hood.ch> for the suggestion. Bug #30578
|