
\summary{2017}{3}{12}

\agendaitem{Open bugs with council involvement}

\begin{itemize}
 \item 
 \bug{565566}:
 No change of status, waiting for infra action.
 \item
 \bug{571490}: 
 council approved the summary and dilfridge stated he would commit it.
 \item
 \bug{611234}:
The following motion was put before the council by k_f and approved unanimously.
\vote{The council confirms its earlier decision (2014-10-14 meeting) to drop CVS
headers after migration to Git.
\begin{enumerate}
\item Any \$Id\$ and \$Header\$ lines are to be removed from ebuilds and 
eclasses in the gentoo repository, as well as from other files, e.g., metadata, 
profiles, and files (except patches) in FILESDIR.
\item Removal should be done at once, and a repoman check should be implemented 
to prevent such lines from accidentally being inserted again.
\item Infra is asked not to expand any \$Id\$ or other keywords, neither at 
rsync generation time, nor via git attributes in the development repository.
\end{enumerate}
}{
Approved unanimously}
\item
\bug{610990}:
Waiting for infra action
\end{itemize}


\agendaitem{Open floor}

Council was asked for a position on \bug{611376}, the github ToS change.
We agreed that this is an issue for the Trustees, so out of our scope.

Dilfridge advised council that his decisions keywording project is
progressing.

K_f advised council that there is a draft GLEP for the security project.
