| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/917224
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/917224
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/917224
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/917224
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/916507
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matoro Mahri <matoro_gentoo@matoro.tk>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matoro Mahri <matoro_gentoo@matoro.tk>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Kohler <bkohler@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Shadowed by 2.2.1. Note that this version has been masked for several days
anyway and the mask will remain to inform people who still have that version
installed.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Shadowed by 2.2.1. Note that this version has been masked for several days
anyway and the mask will remain to inform people who still have that version
installed.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's a race with installing dmsetup where it gets re-created in the image
which breaks things. It's awkward to fix because of the upstream Makefile
layout. Just serialise the install part which shouldn't be a big deal anyway.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/918125
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/917224
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As a mitigation until more is understood and fixes are tested & reviewed, change
the default of zfs_dmu_offset_next_sync from 1 to 0, as it was before
05b3eb6d232009db247882a39d518e7282630753 upstream.
There are no reported cases of The Bug being hit with zfs_dmu_offset_next_sync=1:
that does not mean this is a cure or a real fix, but it _appears_ to be at least
effective in reducing the chances of it happening. By itself, it's a safe change
anyway, so it feels worth us doing while we wait.
Note that The Bug has been reproduced on 2.1.x as well, hence we do it for both
2.1.13 and 2.2.1.
Bug: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/11900
Bug: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/15526
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/917224
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michael Mair-Keimberger <mmk@levelnine.at>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note that it may not fix the issues reported entirely as the race still exists.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/917224
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note that it may not fix the issues reported entirely as the race still exists.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/917224
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Changes are as expected.
Bug: https://github.com/markfasheh/duperemove/issues/330
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michael Mair-Keimberger <mmk@levelnine.at>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Pipping <sping@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Pipping <sping@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/792336
Signed-off-by: Florian Schmaus <flow@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Pipping <sping@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Identical to 6.6-r2 in contents.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Pipping <sping@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20231103201408.GN11264@twin.jikos.cz/T/#u.
It's not quite as the mail makes it sound though -- it wasn't like the 6.6
tarball was the same as 6.5.3, it has a different hash and there were changes
in there which I checked when doing the bump.
Anyway, /var/cache/distfiles/btrfs-progs-v6.6.tar.xz vs /var/cache/distfiles/btrfs-progs-v6.6.respun.tar.xz
adds a bunch of missing but legitimate-looking changes.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ben Kohler <bkohler@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/916453
Signed-off-by: Ben Kohler <bkohler@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matoro Mahri <matoro_gentoo@matoro.tk>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|