diff options
| author |   Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> | 2002-05-19 18:37:21 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> | 2002-05-19 18:37:21 +0000 |
| commit | 79ab8d898d0e16d8394c0203a14db6080d6841b1 (patch) | |
| tree | 839e1bdafafbe642d8dd911269b16c4514c79f60 /FAQ.in | |
| parent | Update. (diff) | |
| download | glibc-79ab8d898d0e16d8394c0203a14db6080d6841b1.tar.gz glibc-79ab8d898d0e16d8394c0203a14db6080d6841b1.tar.bz2 glibc-79ab8d898d0e16d8394c0203a14db6080d6841b1.zip | |
Warn against installing into /usr/local
2002-05-19 Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure.in: Warn against an
installation in /usr/local.
Diffstat (limited to 'FAQ.in')
| -rw-r--r-- | FAQ.in | 13 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -1028,6 +1028,19 @@ This version is needed because the fpos_t type and a few libio internals have changed in glibc 2.2, and gcc 2.95.3 contains a corresponding patch. +?? Why shall glibc never get installed on GNU/Linux systems in +/usr/local? + +{AJ} The GNU C compiler treats /usr/local/include and /usr/local/lib in a +special way, these directories will be searched before the system +directories. Since on GNU/Linux the system directories /usr/include and +/usr/lib contain a --- possibly different --- version of glibc and mixing +certain files from different glibc installations is not supported and will +break, you risk breaking your complete system. If you want to test a glibc +installation, use another directory as argument to --prefix. If you like to +install this glibc version as default version, overriding the existing one, +use --prefix=/usr and everything will go in the right places. + ? Source and binary incompatibilities, and what to do about them ?? I expect GNU libc to be 100% source code compatible with |